This post is in the section : Thèmes

Nuclear facilities decommissioning
and // 6 September 2017 // 2

Photo de gardeDefinition, concerned facilities and challenges

Nuclear power plants still may pose a hazard after the end of their operational life. Thus, they have to be decomissioned in an orderly manner to protect man and the environment.

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), more than 500 reactors and about 275 nuclear fuel cycle facilities have been fully shut down until 2011.

The term “decommissioning” refers to all measures carried out after granting of a decommissioning licence for a nuclear facility until official supervision i. e. nuclear regulatory supervision, is no longer necessary.

This usually implies removal of all parts of the building and restoration of the site to its original condition in form of the so-called “green field”.

The nuclear facilities that are concerned by this decommissioning procedures are :  Power reactors, Prototype reactors, Research reactors  and Nuclear fuel cycle facilities

Huge challenges are facing a decommissioning project, they could be listed as follows :

  • Licencing and legal procedures
  • Components dismantling techniques
  • Safety and radiation protection
  • Residue and waste management

Dismantling strategies

Two different decommissioning strategies could be adopted by the owner of the power plant.

  • Immediate dismantling
  • Dismantling after safe enclosure

The immediate dismantling strategy has the advantage to avoid carrying the technical and the financial weight of dismantling on future generations. It also allows to benefit from the knowledge and skills of the teams present during the operational phase of the plant.

For instance, the adopted strategy in France is the immediate dismantling (note that there are some specific discussions with ASN about the particular case of UNGG reactors (Uranium Naturel Graphite Gaz)). In Germany, immediate dismantling strategy was as well adopted for most of the nuclear facilities. However, deferred dismantling program was selected for some facilities.

In the USA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission gives the choice to the operators to select between the two strategies. So far, the deferred dismantling strategy has been much more chosen for the last decommissioning programs. In Sweden and most of Eastern Europe countries, the deferred dismantling strategy has been selected because of some constraints related to decommissioning facilities and/or funds availability.

The table below summarizes the main advantages and disadvantages of the two different dismantling strategies.

111

Dismantling and disassembly challenges

222

Overview of dismantling legal and technical steps 

Click on the graphics below to display them in extended format

3

Overview of nuclear facilities dismantling legal steps

4

Overview of nuclear facilities dismantling technical steps

 

References :

  • Guide de l’ASN n° 6 , Version actualisée du 30/08/2016 : Arrêt définitif, démantèlement et déclassement des installations nucléaires de base
  • Strub, Erik & Stahl, T. (2012). Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities.

 

Tags: , , , , ,

No related post

 
Copyright © 2015 BearingPoint. All rights reserved.